Bill mentioned last week that this week’s topic was a difficult one, and I would have to agree. I had a hard time deciding where to start, but once I got started, I had a hard time stopping.
The idea of committed knowledge is hard for me because on one hand, I understand the idea of believing in something just because you do. My religious beliefs would fall into this category. It doesn’t seem at all strange to me to accept what I believe in unconditionally, and to believe because of faith.
However, on the other hand, the idea of believing in other areas just because someone tells you that it is what you should do is scary. I can see from the outside looking in how obviously wrong some beliefs are to me, but people on the inside don’t have that same viewpoint. This concept is what led me to thinking about the story of the blind men and the elephant, an ancient parable where all of the characters felt a different part of the elephant and came away believing that from their experience alone, they knew what an elephant resembled. We consider our own perceptions, and what we intake through our own senses, as valuable information. We use this to construct knowledge. But what if our perceptions are flawed, as in the parable? Is this partly how stereotypes are perpetuated? Is this one source of racist ideas? I know this is a big jump, but in some way, this seems connected to me.
My next connection went to the idea of visual perceptions, and how illusions trick our minds into thinking things are different than what they seem. Many students like to look at these and play with the images, so they seem like a way to point out the idea of how things may be different than they seem. I’m trying to work out how to use this connection to the idea of deeper levels.
While I was looking into some information on illusions, I came across the name Al Seckler, who is a cognitive neuroscientist who specializes in this area. His wikipedia page gave me some interesting background information on how he was member of the Freethinkers movement, which is as far from “committed knowledge” as you can get. I guess my connections are actually opposites, but that’s okay because I’m learning about things I wasn’t expecting to. I feel like this week’s learning journey took the long way around.
And to top it all off, my connection to Al led me to a video showing some examples of his work with visual illusions, and it happened to be from the TED site, which we know is one of Ryan’s favorite sites. I had just finished watching his post of the week, and within an hour or less, I ended up there myself, through a completely different path. And while researching Al, I ended up on the Edge.org site, and read about “black swans”, which I had never heard about before Ed’s post. I’m fascinated by all these cross-connections, and how what we are doing really does start to fit together.




